Irishblooded
Well-known member
- Messages
- 3,198
Is it a better system. Or is it more of turning into soccer and doing penalty kicks over and over ?
I think it sucks to be blunt. The NFL rule is vastly better. I’m not an NFL guy, but I think CFB should consider adopting a version of their OT format.Is it a better system. Or is it more of turning into soccer and doing penalty kicks over and over ?
I think it sucks to be blunt. The NFL rule is vastly better. I’m not an NFL guy, but I think CFB should consider adopting a version of their OT format.
This right here. Why did college change the ot rules to begin with?I actually hate the NFL style.
I do like the idea of requiring a 2 point conversion if you get a TD.
But I don't like the just going back and forth with a 2 point play.
They said it was for players safety. But in that 9 ot debacle yesterday, the starting qb appeared to have broken his wrist in one of the late ot periods.This right here. Why did college change the ot rules to begin with?
This right here. Why did college change the ot rules to begin with?
This right here in my opinion is how it should be done.I actually hate the NFL style.
I do like the idea of requiring a 2 point conversion if you get a TD.
But I don't like the just going back and forth with a 2 point play.
They said it was for players safety. But in that 9 ot debacle yesterday, the starting qb appeared to have broken his wrist in one of the late ot periods.
If you saw it and the way he landed, it was like, ouch, that had to hurt.They said it was for players safety. But in that 9 ot debacle yesterday, the starting qb appeared to have broken his wrist in one of the late ot periods.
I hated the way that was done. IMHO the original OT was fine IF they would change that to read that if the first team with possession in the third and later OTs converted a one point conversion that the second team must go for two. It adds a little pressure to the coin flip decision.I do like the idea of requiring a 2 point conversion if you get a TD.
I like the idea of keeping FGs in the game for OT and the first OT with an extra point would be the last. Of course, the first team with possession can go for two but the other can kick the extra point if you are unsuccessful with the 2 point attempt.That isn't bad either.
The plus of requiring it on every TD is just like this last weekend. Either someone is going to miss and then that's that. Or what did happen. You literally run out of 2 point plays and just either recycle them or do HB dives.
Either of those though is still better than what we did see happen was just glorified soccer penalty kicks back and forth
I think this would be the best way to do it, but no one asks my opinionI like the idea of keeping FGs in the game for OT and the first OT with an extra point would be the last. Of course, the first team with possession can go for two but the other can kick the extra point if you are unsuccessful with the 2 point attempt.